Pudorem non suggilat, an expression that is unique in the Digesta. However, there is also an additional type of action mentioned, To bring a famosa actio.111 The use of the phrase actio famosa here mirrors that inĭigesta 3.2. Person must be made where his status as a libertus is at issue when it is proposed In accordance with this, a preliminary inquiry into the status of a Permission is granted si famosa actio non sit uel pudorem non suggilat („if it is neither an actio famosa nor suggests
Patroness without the Praetor‟s permission. Summon a parent, patron or patroness or the children or parents of a patron or In relation to particular persons, it is stated that persons are not allowed to Praetorian one by which it could be litigated‟).109 Made in relation to dolus malus, where it is stated that dolus malus can only beīrought when there is no other relevant action quoniam famosa actio non temere debuit a praetore decerni, si sit ciuilis uel honoraria, qua possit experiri („sinceĪn actio famosa ought not be rashly decreed by the Praetor, if there is a civil or The Digesta states that, in general, where a person has been deceived withoutįault, the Praetor should grant restitutio in integrum, quam actionem famosamġ01 Digesta 47.10.15.22 (Ulpian): „ … adsiduo enim frequentia quasi praebet nonnullam infamiam‟.ġ04 Digesta 47.10.15.27 (Ulpian): „haec autem fere sunt, quae ad infamiam alicuius fiunt‟.ġ05 Digesta 47.10.42pr (Paul): „Iudici ab appellatoribus conuicium fieri non oportet:Ĭhapter 2: The Digesta and Institutiones 71Ĭonstituere („rather than instituting an actio famosa‟),107 which in this particularĬase would have been an action for dolus malus.108 A similar statement is also This was trueīoth in general and in relation to granting actiones to particular persons against Hesitancy to grant actiones famosae, not evident in Digesta 3.2. The terminology actiones famosae is also used in the Digesta outside title 3.2 forĪctiones, condemnation for which entailed infamia.
0 kommentar(er)
